Hard News, Heartfelt Opinions
Scott M. Bushnell, Indiana University Press, 2007

Hard
News, Heartfelt Opinions, Scott M. Bushnell, Indiana University
Press, 2007
Anyone
who thinks that biased journalism and opinionated media personalities are
recent creations, brought on by the rise of Fox News and talk radio, should
read Scott BushnellÕs Hard
News, Heartfelt Opinions, a history of
the newspaper business in Fort Wayne – most specifically the genealogy of
the cityÕs most successful paper, the Journal Gazette. The city that Bushnell
chronicles is a turbulent stew of racial tensions, corrupt politicians,
backstabbing businessmen, natural disasters and economic hardships. Far from
being a voice of reason in the midst of the turmoil, Fort WayneÕs newspapers,
at least at the dawn of the medium, helped to stoke the fires of chaos with
their muckraking, disingenuous political maneuvering, fear-mongering, and nonexistent
ethics. If you think that the media play fast and loose with the facts these
days, you donÕt know your history.
Bushnell
describes a time when newspapers werenÕt expected to be bastions of objective
journalism. ÒFair and balancedÓ hadnÕt been invented yet; newspapers were
founded with an explicit political affiliation, and their primary reason for
existence was to promote a particular political agenda. Bushnell steps into
that political/media environment near the middle of the 19th century, when the
country was gearing up for civil war and cities and states were beginning to
choose sides. Political alignments were many and varied – abolitionists,
radical Republicans, Confederate sympathizers, Democrats, German immigrants and
others – and every political group had its own newspaper ... or two, or
three. The papers that grew out of the antebellum foment were the predecessors
of the FWJG, and Bushnell traces the ideological development of the paper from
that tumultuous time to the paper we know today.
The
Fort Wayne Bushnell depicts is a surprisingly bleak place. In the pre-Civil War
period, the city harbored groups with divergent viewpoints, but all of them
were, to a greater or lesser degree, racist; those who opposed the coming war
felt that the Confederacy should be left alone, and those who supported action
against the South did so out of concern for the nationÕs unity rather than
because of any moral obligation to end slavery. Everyone, it seemed, was afraid
that, should slavery be abolished, Fort Wayne would be overrun by free blacks
– and the newspapers did much to bolster that fear. During the war,
pro-Confederate sentiment was so strong in Fort Wayne that the Union government
paid special attention to the city, fearing that it might trigger secession of
a second confederacy.
After
the war, the bigotry and xenophobia of the citizenry was focused on immigrants,
but by the beginning of the 20th century, racism had ramped up again.
Fortunately, the Journal Gazette, in its new role as civic watchdog rather than
as political attack dog, had begun to see the value of bucking popular opinion
when necessary in order to promote what it saw as desirable civic attitudes. At
a time when a third of Hoosier men were members of the Ku Klux Klan – and
when the KKK controlled state politics – the FWJG was not afraid to speak
out against racism and white supremacy fanatics.
The
persistent problems with racism, coupled with such dispiriting new stories as
the floods of 1913 and 1982, the Aveline Hotel fire, the closing of the
International Harvester plant, the attempted assassination of civil rights
leader Vernon Jordan and the exodus of Lincoln National, make Fort Wayne seem
like not such a great place to be. On the other hand, the cityÕs run of bad
luck could make one grateful for a steadfast media outlet with a good
conscience; the Journal Gazette, Bushnell points out, has been just that.
BushnellÕs book, despite its own claims to an Òinformal toneÓ and
Òsnappy style,Ó will probably appeal most to history buffs. Especially in the
early going, the FWJGÕs lineage is twisted and confusing, and, although
Bushnell does his best to sort it out, the paperÕs family tree is still
bewildering (and the late-20th-century era of joint operating agreements and
corporate buy-outs is no picnic, either). Bushnell tells the paperÕs story
primarily through profiles of the men who made the paper tick – and I do
mean men; until the 1980s, in BushnellÕs account at least, women were not a
significant part of the newspaper game – and the steady parade of
personalities over more than a century, too, can get a little overwhelming.
Fort Wayne in pictures
For
those who like to see history as much as they like to read about it, Historic Photos of Fort
Wayne (Turner Publishing, 2007) makes
a nice companion to Hard
News. This handsome volume of old
pictures of the city illustrates many of the places and events that Bushnell
describes in his narrative (Bushnell provided the text for the photo book, as
well), and the photos do much to enliven what might otherwise read as dry
history.
A
wealth of architectural photos makes the book a valuable record of the
buildings that played important roles in the cityÕs development, and photos of
landmark events – such as the 1913 flood and the Aveline Hotel fire
– are evocative. Perhaps most charming, though, are a series of
unassuming street photos, views of Calhoun Street in the 1890s. Here, the old,
thriving city is alive, dirty yet vibrant, bustling and young. These are
fascinating images, inviting close scrutiny, tempting one into a time-warp
daydream.
Taken
together, the two books are a thorough timeline of the city as seen through the
development of its newspapers. The picture is not always pleasant, but is
sometimes surprising; after reading Hard News
especially, youÕre likely to see Fort Wayne in a way youÕve not seen the city
before.
Evan Gillespie is a former Fort Wayne native living in South Bend.
Copyright 2007 Ad Media Inc.